Thursday, May 12, 2005

Where is the 2cents worth?

I was going through Sammyboy Forums, of which the ratio of good, readable content to trash-talk/flamewar/whining is approximately 1:1000. Whenever I sift through the site I feel like I am a lone diver trawling the entire span of the Pacific Ocean looking for less than half a dozen pearls.

I was actually looking for AcidFlask related material, when one forummer queried about how the opposition parties failed to get in their 2 cents worth on the AF-A*Star saga.

I pondered upon this thought for a while. I was surprised, as I am inclined to think that this was the exact kind of subject material the Opposition Opportunists love to capitalise on. They were indeed strangely subdued over this matter.

A few seconds later, the answer hit me like a tonne of falling bricks.


UPDATE:
This was meant to be a brief observational post on opposition parties silence over the AF-A*Star affair. Interestingly it has garnered (imho) various top quality comments ancillary to the original post.

To find out more about Han's indignance at being labelled 'pro-PAP', Redrown's (me) 'anthropological' study of Sammyboy Forums, Gilbert Koh's reaction to SDP's unauthorised lifting of his articles, Goh Meng Seng's (WP) opinion of non-partisan bloggers and name calling, and Huichieh's excellent justification and clarification of (non-partisan) bloggers position, click on the comments!

UPDATE 2:
Huichieh continues to chew upon the role of non-partisan bloggers in civil society, reflecting on Jeffrey's insightful comment. As he (Jeff) aptly puts it, we are simply "Equal Opportunity Commentators". That would be a good starting point for anyone who do not fully appreciate our niche.

49 Comments:

Blogger Daniel said...

Bah...that forum is only good for sex-talk.

4:13 AM  
Blogger redrown said...

Han: hahaha..if only they could appreciate the wide spectra of hues available between black and white.

and also they still don't seem capable of realising the sacrilegous magnitude of what they did (SLMJD-lifting)

when we kindly point it out to them, they take it as an affront.

no surprise then that they wouldn't try to chip in and 'defend' us (bloggers) even if that would precipitate their primary aim as the opposition, as in their linear world we are henceforth one of their adversaries.

Daniel: special mention must be given to the polls, where one can find out gems of trivia such as number of prostitutes haters and Fiona Xie lovers...^_-

4:38 AM  
Blogger Han said...

redrown:

And Omega Na Hu's Ur Daddy accused me of being rude! I mean, ok fine, I'm rude, but they're just so asking for it...

They set themselves up so perfectly to be satired and parodied, its like all the work's done for me and I just have to put it together. sigh... these people don't appreciate my art.

6:41 AM  
Blogger Han said...

redrown:

And on topic, I agree with you, its just like you said.

These fako 'Opposition' people don't see why they have to defend us when we so harshly criticize them. They fear us, because we have the means and the power to expose them as frauds.

We have logic and reason on our side. I mean, come on, anyone with half a brain reading our critique will see these 'Opposition' poseurs for the opportunists and snake-oil consters that they really are.

And like you said, they completely do not appreciate the sacrilegous nature of that act of copying SLMJD and pretending as though GK endorsed that copying.

I personally feel that misrepresenting someone else's ideas is probably the most heinous crime anyone can do.

But then again, you can't really expect people who haven't had an original idea in 20 years to respect ideas, do you?

6:47 AM  
Blogger redrown said...

Whiteout:

Well, this is my impression of Sammyboy Forums:

Out of 10+ posts, one post will actually attempt a proper discussion by pasting a news article or raising a serious topic. The others will focus on Fiona Xie's boobs (very nice, confirm fake one but anyway she is a slut), why we should all leave Sinkapoor (bcos Sinkapoor SUX) , how all sg-girls are materialistic b*ches (Because they refuse to look at me for even one sec, boohoo) and how poor sg-guys are all dying because of NS. (because NS is exploitation by gahmen)

In the 'serious' post, there will be 1 or 2 serious replies, followed by another 10 or 20 which goes along the lines of 'Pappy Sux'

2 or 4 people will get into a flame war with each others, usually involving somewhat colorful language. This has the potential to drive the number of post replies up to triple figures.

The resident lone girl will post an inane comment and suddenly she gets threatened with all sorts of vile comments. This ALSO has the potential to drive post replies up to triple figures. In fact a new topic post may be created just to emphasise how 'prostitute' she is.

Sam will post a one-liner saying sg guys are wimps and whiners and the guys will start whining at him like wimps.

No one remembers what the original topic was about.

__
And this is not what I'm used to hearing. Not at my local kopitiam anyway...heheh;)

7:41 AM  
Blogger redrown said...

Han 641:

They set themselves up so perfectly to be satired and parodied, its like all the work's done for me and I just have to put it together. sigh... these people don't appreciate my art.

Hahaha..well..I do..and your readers too...in fact, it is most probable that they are the only people not to take too kindly to it ...

7:46 AM  
Blogger redrown said...

Han 647:

What makes it even more sacrilegous is that it is clear they have absolute disrespect for GK's political beliefs, by deliberately misrepresenting GK as one of them... And they expect people not to take issue with that, when they are a political party. SIGH.

Actually, come to think of it, misrepresenting/copying IS a unique idea. Don't think anyone else has ever resorted to it before..

7:48 AM  
Blogger redrown said...

heheh well in some ways Sammyboy is the online version of a kopitiam, i guess the difference is that in Sammyboy most of them are behind a veil of anonimity and that emboldens them to more extreme and colourful behaviour and language .

9:42 AM  
Blogger GK said...

Last week the Straits Times interviewed me about the Acidflask incident.

They also asked me one or two questions about the fact that the SDP had swiped my SLMJD articles.

I answered all their questions about Acidflask, but I declined to answer any of their questions about the SDP incident.

One reason was that I didn't want to muck up the issues (ie I wanted their article to stay focused on Acidflask instead of branching off into other things).

As it turns out, it may not have mattered - since the ST, so far, and as far as I know, hasn't featured any of my comments at all.

However, one thing is that the Acidflask incident did lead me to view the SDP incident in a slightly different light.

I suppose I could write a very fierce, lawyer-ly sort of letter to the SDP to tell them to take off my articles from their website. And threaten them with legal action for copyright infringement etc.

That was what I intended to do at first, anyway.

On further thought, that would make me somewhat similar to Philip Yeo, wouldn't it?

I object in principle to the SDP stealing my articles, but I object even more in principle to behaving like a bully.

So - what the heck. I'm not going to write any fierce, threatening letter to the SDP.

All I'm going to do is leave the SLMJD blog skeleton up, with the notice in the sidebar stating that:

1. the SDP has used my articles without my permission; and

2. I'm not related or associated to the SDP.

Philip Yeo doesn't know it, but he's saved the SDP's ass.

12:00 PM  
Blogger Daniel said...

redrown: +1000 for your analysis of the sammyboy forums! You cracked me up big time. Maybe you really are the paragon of humour ;)

as an aside, is the level of intellect in the sammyboy forum a good indication of that of the general s'pore population? :x

1:53 PM  
Blogger redrown said...

GK: Ah, so that is the reason why the posts are still up at the site. Ever thought of at least emailing or writing them a civil, 'kindly worded' letter requesting them to take it down?

If you hadn't informed us, I would have been inclined to think that you were actually a member/contributor to them. Thats how deceptively misrepresentative they have presented it. People who went to their site but have no knowledge of your own site's disclaimer would be misled as well, I would think, and have unwarranted preconceptions of your political affilations.

PY saving SDP's ass. Now thats one big irony I could chew on for quite a while. I guess SDP cluelessly returned the favour by not getting in on this act. heheh.

7:04 PM  
Blogger redrown said...

Daniel: Heh, actually, I would think it serves as a good indication of the repression/frustration/ineptitude of the Sammyboy community. Due to its 'atmosphere', it has a disproportionately larger number of self-defeatists males.

I do believe though that there are many other level headed people (including a lot of girls) in Singapore who read the site as well, but find it futile to attempt a post of reason.

7:09 PM  
Blogger the backs of angels said...

redrown redrown redrown... why on earth do you peruse those forums in the first place???

shianux, i realise you've met Larry Lessig! that guy's cool, sial.

12:56 AM  
Blogger redrown said...

heh, i did mention, i was looking for AF related material. Allow me to save you the trouble of going there and let me share with you some gems of wisdom that I gleaned:

1) PY is a [insert derogatory term here]

2) PY has a small ****

3) PY is a degenerate scum bla bla

4) PY is also known as Failip Yeo

5) PY and Pappy Gov should be [insert some violent comeuppance here]

6) Cheryl Fox is a slut

__
I have to resist the temptation to further make digs at the forums..

7:43 AM  
Blogger the backs of angels said...

yeah i read that bit, and i read the bit where you liken it to trawling the Pacific Ocean for a few pearls. I still don't get why you were looking there of all places! :p

by the way, I propose that the image of one digging through a filthy gutter for a ten cent piece would be more fitting.

10:27 AM  
Blogger redrown said...

This post wasnt really meant to be a Sammyboy Bashing post but i guess the nature of Sammyboy unraveled itself along the way, as did my general distaste for a good portion of its content. Which is why i chose ocean/pearl rather than gutter/cent analogy. Heheh.

10:53 AM  
Blogger redrown said...

hahaha...well...it was highly amusing=)

10:48 AM  
Blogger Admin said...

I hate to say this but when people view opposition parties as "fake" but at the same time, wonder why they didn't "defend" their rights, I would say, what's your point?

Armchair critis are everywhere and some have very good logical views on the surface. However, one must understand the structure of power and what matters most to the ruling party. You could give all the good reasonings and argument you want, it will only "itch" the ruling party or they wouldn't even be bothered with you if there isn't anything defamative against them!

It is only through partisan politics that one could exert the maximum influence to the ruling party via the direct threat to their power base by participating in GE. You could just sit there and call people like us "fake" for all you want, but we are the ones who are risking our lives, families for this single belief: political competition will bring the best out of the policies.

But I also understand that partisan politis alone cannot change Singapore's political landscape. However, such name calling by by-standers here is really unwarranted. We thread a very thin line of very little margin of error. And for the record, we are definitely not any less smarter than anyone of you here.

Goh Meng Seng
singaporealternatives.blogspot.com

11:27 AM  
Blogger Huichieh said...

Re: Goh Meng Seng's comment

1. "The opposition is fake/stupid/etc." I would not endorse this point as a given. Obviously, particular opposition leaders, proposals, moves, etc., can be fake/stupid/etc., but so likewise particular PAP personnel, moves, etc. When such charges are made, presumably it's for some reason (e.g., as was done in detail by Han, the Ink crew, etc., for the Casino statements). I would encourage both the one charging stupidity/fakeness and the one being accused to look to the specific reasons and to carry on the dispute there. The rest is just name calling.

2. The opposition is politically partisan. This is obviously true. In fact, the opposition would be useless if it were not partisan. But this is also a reason why individual bloggers (not necessarily all bloggers though) are uncomfortable with being associated with the opposition--because they are not comfortable with partisan politics period. (There is a price to pay for that; below 4.) Ditto for bloggers being smarter than the opposition.

3. It is rude of a partisan to "enlist" the words of a non-partisan in such a way as if the latter endorses the former's position, and yet without his consent. I have not actually read the quotations of Gilbert on the SDP site, but if they are as Gilbert reports them, all I can say is: shame on you SDP, you can surely do better than that!

3b. On the one hand, I salute the partisans--of all stripes, actually, for their passion enough to be partisans. I would only remind them that not everyone is a partisan, and that our being unwilling to be partisan is not necessarily a sign of stupidity, lack of resolve, brainwashing, whatever. Surely the world is big enough for all types.

4. If someone wants to change Singapore in some big and obvious way--i.e., at the level of policy--he's better off taking MM's advice. Form a party, contest the GE, i.e., become a partisan. The rest of us ("us" because it includes "me") should be aware that armchair criticism can only go so far in making any real impact. And I think most bloggers understand this quite well. We remain armchair critics not because we have illusions about what we can achieve or the nature of power, but because we have different ambitions.

1:39 PM  
Blogger jeffyen said...

For this rest of this comment, the term 'blogger' shall refer to a person who belongs to the 'non-infantile social group' as defined in McDermott's (2005) ethnography of Singaporean bloggers.

I'm just thinking of the 'partisan' label. One problem, at least in SG, is that once a group/person is explicitly labelled as 'opposition', and worse, if it has a capital 'O', is that almost immediately, the conditioning kicks in. All the images and feelings one has with jailtime, defamation suits, family in danger, whiners, wimps, bondbreakers etc. all rush in at once.

Bloggers have it a bit better. Bloggers start with 'B', it won't illicit an immediate conditioning response.

Bloggers can also have a partisan POV, but as far as I can see, it's partisan on the side of 'reasoned argument' and 'unspinning the spin', but like Loy suggests, it's not partisan on the side of politics. It is decidedly non-political (probably a result of my big 'O' conditioning hypothesis) except for those like Goh's that is explicitly aligned to a particular party. It doesn't have to be political to achieve its aims. And yet it's making a difference in the level of discussion, which eventually, might be benefitial to Goh's cause, but that's not an immediate intention, at least it's not mine.

Let me come back to Goh's understandable frustrations. I agree that bloggers in general are not risking life and limb for a cause, but I don't really agree that 'to change things in a big and obvious way, one needs to form a party, participate in GE etc.'

There are other things that also needs to be done. And this is where I think the real value-add of a blogger is, the ability to engage the reader individually, fielding comments and learning new things all the time and raising the level of discourse unheard of and disallowed in state-controlled media.

I also think that's what the most misunderstood person this side of the Local Blogsphere, Han, is fighting against; donkeys that wear hats.

Bloggers don't seem to be doing this for an ultimate political end, and yet, either side of the political spectrum may get the ultimate benefit since a discerning constituent is good for the country either way. So, take heart, Goh, it's not as bad as it looks. For a start, Net ettiquette really needs to be looked at. And yes, it's another Opposition party's problem, but Oppositions keep getting lumped together; not your fault, I know. (Again, it's just because of the big 'O' hypothesis.) :)

To finish: bloggers are generally (as far as I can tell) equal-opportunity commentators/writers/anti-asshats fighters. Don't believe, just ask Han. LOL

7:45 PM  
Blogger Admin said...

For the record, even as a partisan individual, I have experienced the same type of psychological FEAR as anyone out here. I reasoned with my own FEAR and I won it.

However, there are REAL people, social activists out there who are willing to be identified WITH an opposition party like SDP. The recent Death Penalty issue has raised awareness among performers from Substations and the rest, to come together to put up performances for the cause. The initial apprehension of FEAR is understandable.

For internet activists like bloggers, they too could play a role if they want to, not necessarily partisan role. I am of the view that if you want a healthy development for Singapore's political landscape, everyone has a role to play. Partisan politics may only appeal to a small fraction of people, that's fine. But what we need urgently now is activists of all kinds, be it internet, social of political activists, to be actively seeking social-political space in this regime.

As for SDP using Gilbert's article, I would agree that it is impolite not for SDP to ask Gilbert's permission first. I would normally ask permission from writers to put up their writings on my blog. However, SDP did credit the article to Gilbert. Maybe SDP is just too used to cut and paste news articles which are in public domain.

Gilbert is unhappy about SDP quoting his article basically because he is unhappy to be portrayed as somebody "identifying" with an opposition party like SDP. That's fully understandable. I think for any opposition political parties to seek his permission would end up with a big NO.

But look at it from another perspective, if we want to develop into a matured democratic society, why should one be FEARFUL to be identified with any political parties? It is perfectly normal for non-partisan activists to stand side by side with any oppositionists in any countries out there to fight for a particular cause. But in Singapore, why the apprehension?

I have once talked to friend about this, he is fearful. I told him, if you cannot eradicate this fear, what will happen to your children?

Jeffrey is right, bloggers do play a part subtlely. But play it wise and right. The pen (or now, computer/net) is mightier than the guns.

Goh Meng Seng
singaporealternatives.blogspot.com

12:39 PM  
Blogger Huichieh said...

There you go again Meng Seng :) Why assume that it's FEAR? Perhaps that accounts for some of the reactions, but I'm just not convinced that it is really such a determinative factor. At the very least, it is only one possible factor in a very complex cocktail. Perhaps some are just not interested enough, value their privacy more, have other ambitions, more detached/academic in their stake, etc., etc.?

But I think what bloggers such as Jeff, myself and others are getting at is simply a plea that our stated goals be taken as they are, that we not be hastily conscripted for the purposes of others. Here's a clue: my suspicion is that many bloggers are rather individualist people, fiercely jealous of what autonomy they(we) enjoy. Not that we cannot cooperate or work together, but even when we do, we'd rather that it's because we are individually convinced of the soundness of the cause rather than just 'roped in' (or even 'associated') without ado.

A quirk no doubt, but bear with us :)

3:05 AM  
Blogger Admin said...

Dear huichieh,

It is an interesting dissection you have here. If not FEAR, then what?

Interests? Choice? My friend used to present the same argument...oh, its a matter of choice. It takes a while of probing that eventually he himself realize that it is pure FEAR to start with.

We have to be truthful to ourselves. If its FEAR, its FEAR.

Especially so for people who are "courageous" enough to go onto the net to talk about political stuffs on the net, if there isn't any "seeds" of "interests" they won't have done so. Choice? What choices have they made and based on what they have made that choices?

It may not be that it is total FEAR that is in play, but in Singapore's context, this is a too common theme. Before I step into WP, I also told myself, I am only to become an internet armchair critic and I have justified my position vigorously in internet forums for standing on the sideline; of my rights of choice of doing so.

It only takes a simple test for me to realize, it is not my "principles" or "choice" that provides me that rationalization of being so. It is pure FEAR. Yes, pure FEAR. You will have to confront it directly before you understand your own psyche. I made up my mind to pay WP HQ a visit on one fine Monday evening. The old WP HQ has a long, eerie, dark staircase. I was standing right in front of the staircase but my feet sunk into the floor. Heart beats increased. Palms sweating. Yes, this is Pure FEAR. Up till then, I thought I was "brave" and "courageous" and it is not FEAR that prevented me from partisan politics but purely choice. I was totally wrong and I admit defeat right on that spot.

I did not make it to the WP HQ that night but instead, spent the whole night trying to understand my own FEAR. I reason with it. I fought against it. I am glad I won. The rest is history.

Many people doesn't even realize their very own FEAR, just like me, until they put themselves into that challenge.

Well, I would respect your point being that it is not FEAR but a cocktail of things that prevented bloggers from identifying with opposition parties. That's fine. I will take it as it is. But I hope everyone would be truthful to themselves, face their inner FEAR headon instead of brushing it away for ego's sake.

I don't just "rope" people in. It is always a willing party that matters and that will last long. Nobody could force you to do anything if you don't like it. But my point is, one must first eradicate such psychological barriers before they could claim to have "FREEDOM OF CHOICE".

As for the owner of this blog wondering why opposition parties did not say a word over the ASTAR incident, I would say, did anyone raise any issues over JBJ or CSJ being sued bankrupted? I think the the disappointment is just mutual.

Furthermore, if any opposition parties raise this issue, it would do Mr. Chen no good. PAP govt is a govt that want face and very thin skin. It will try to "protect" its "authority" jealously. It is ok for citizens to have brushes with it but let off. But when opposition parties step in, they will just want to "prove their point" and things might get worse.

There isn't much "political capital" to be gained from this issue. Opposition parties would be painted by the local mass media as "supporting bond breakers" and "against National Interests".

Goh Meng Seng
singaporealternatives.blogspot.com

8:08 PM  
Blogger Huichieh said...

Think of it this way: let's imagine a possible world that is most like the actual world but where there is no more FEAR (i.e., makes the fewest possible changes consistent with there being absolutely no FEAR). Is there good reason to expect that many more people would join the opposition in that possible world?

My own gut-feeling answer is either "no, not really" or "a lot less than Mr. Goh expects"--a lot less people are into partisan politics the way he is so much so that even without the FEAR factor, I am just not convinced that they will line up to get involved.

Notice that I didn't deny the relevance of FEAR altogether--it obviously is determinative for specific individuals; I just don't think it's a fabulous blanket explanation. It's too sweeping (makes deep assumptions about human motivation), it is too cavaliar about the self-understanding of people who say that they are not interested, and it's too easy (for the self-esteem of certain political types, say).

But like you said, you are willing to grant the point that the explanatary cocktail may be a lot more complex, so let's rest that matter.

Incidentally, no one I know of is accusing you or the WP of "roping" anyone; yet (if anyone knows of any cases, I stand corrected; I just don't follow that sort of stuff closely enough). It was the SDP--trusting Gilbert's account of what happened--that was being rude.

Nor did I really expect (perhaps somewhat contrary to some of my fellow bloggers?) that any of the opposition parties would step in for AcidFlask--in fact, I think they did the smart thing not to. And that helped bloggers too: because doing so will only escalate the matter unnecessarily. So in that sense, there was no disappointment here.

But I am glad that you left the comments: you sound like a reasonable person, more so that some of the people I've come across at you-know-where forums.

2:08 AM  
Blogger Admin said...

Dear huichieh,

We do not need to construct a hypothetical world to understand this. Just take US or even Asia countries like Taiwan for example.

Taiwan has about 22 million plus citizens. Let's put it that it has 10 times more population than Singapore. But do you know how many people join the opposition political parties? (Or what we call, political participation in general)

Before Taiwan was liberalized from Marshall law, political participation on the "opposite" side is pathetic. It was just like Singapore. But after the liberalization, there is a steady growth.

If we take Singapore's opposition members at 500 people altogether (this is really an exaggeration already!) 10 times of this is 5000. But in Taiwan at the moment, DPP has 530 thousands of members!
(ref: http://www.dpp.org.tw/ ) During the early 80s, no one in Taiwan would expect this "illegal" entity to have so many members! If it is not FEAR, what is it that deter these many people from joining DPP?

If it is really something else that prevented a vibrant political development in Singapore, then I would respect that. But apparently it is not and the worse thing to happen is to have citizens who self-rationalize themselves and in the end deluded themselves that it is not FEAR that deter them from active participation. This is important because you will forever avoid solving the fundamental problem of FEAR if you don't even want to admit it is a problem at all.

Singapore in the 50s and 60s had a vibrant political landscapre. We are actually the model or leader of political development and vibrancy in this region. While other places were still controlled by colonists or warlords, we are already fighting for autonomy, democracy and independence.

But 50 years later, we become the most "politically backward" country in this region! Why is this so? Isn't it FEAR that has been installed by the regime that created this result?

I think I will leave it as it is. There is no point keep poking at people trying to point out their "problem" if they are not willing or ready to take it seriously. Of course, I might have over-generalized the situation here, but I am confident that at least 80% of the time, I am on the spot. I understand it because I have gone through the same phase before, as everybody else does.

Goh Meng Seng

12:19 PM  
Blogger Huichieh said...

Hold on a second--let's not be too sure that any Singapore-Taiwan comparison would hold just like that. (And I don't even want to go to the US case, which is by all appearances... worlds away from our situation.) Just to begin: is Taiwan under military rule (marshall law) the same as Singapore under PAP rule?(??!!) That's hyperbolic, to say the least.

Remember that thought experiment I proposed requires a possible world "most like the actual world but where there is no more FEAR"--switching to talk about Taiwan--another set of unique historical circumstances, another political culture altogether--seems a besides the point.

So let us forget about Taiwan and return to talk about Singapore.

Let me, for the sake of the argument grant two premises: (1) Singapore in the 50s and 60s had "a vibrant political landscape"--in the specific sense that there were a viable multiplicity of political parties. (2) Singapore today is one-party dominated; the others do not appear viable (however else that is described).

You ask the rhetorical question: "Why is this so? Isn't it FEAR that has been installed by the regime that created this result?"

But let's consider the known facts: remember that the PAP wasn't, like the KMT, backed by an army from day one. It had to win elections. It did not begin as the only legal party. In fact, it did not even begin as the strongest party. In the first election (1955) the PAP contested, they won 3 (out of a possible 25 seats). They routed the Liberal Front + Liberal Socialists combination in 1959 (winning 43 of 51 seats), but suffer a loss in '63 when they won 37 of 51 seats. It was only in '68 onwards that they beginning all or almost all seats.

So, to ask your question again: What happened? How was it that Singapore became dominated by one party from a baseline when that one party wasn't in a position to impose any supposed FEAR on anyone? And we can be more precise too: what happened between '55 and '59 and '68?

It is with these considerations in mind that I find the FEAR hypothesis somewhat simplistic.

And actually, it is all very irrelevant. The original question was: is FEAR the reason why people today do not join the opposition? It is not the same question as: was FEAR the reason why Singapore came to be dominated by one party from a multi-party baseline back in the 50s and 60s?

Let me assure you I am serious about this; I am just not convinced.

The question that intrigues me to no end is this: are you--and other convinced partisan types (and not necessarily opposition too)--willing to grant the possibility that someone else could really come to a different conclusion even from possibly the same set of data and yet not (for that reason alone) be unserious, irrational, brainwashed, or suffer from any variety of false consciousness? That is the

4:30 AM  
Blogger Huichieh said...

...that is the sixty million dollar question; at least for me.

4:31 AM  
Blogger redrown said...

hmm..

just a quick and short announcement, i will not be able to maintain this blog for a few weeks (or months) as I am pursuing my first love, traveling.

it might be interesting to note that while my blog is hardly a travelogue, to me, traveling is by far an interest closer to my heart, than say, singapore politics and current affairs.

and its not really out of fear that i prefer traveling to current affairs, i'd rather call it preference

meanwhile, keep up the debates here and your own blogs (i still try to keep up with them, though i don't have time to post comments anymore:)

1:37 AM  
Blogger Admin said...

Dear Loy & whiteout,

I would not rule out the possibility of "dislike" or "preference (not to)" that some would take NOT out of FEAR to be identified with an opposition party.

However, I would urge all of you here to consider probing into your own inner subconsciousness first before you come to that conclusions.

As I have said before, I used to think the way you guys assert; I thought my dis-association with any political parties is a "Choice" made on "neutrality" but I was wrong when I become mindful of my inner FEAR when put to test.

There is no need to perpetuate such FEAR and I am always the one who would stop people from pepertuating such FEAR. But for bloggers here, I find my past self which is also "disturbing" to me. One should not perpetuate such FEAR nor be ignorance of its existence within oneself.

Maybe one day, when the real test come, you will understand yourself better whether your distance from partisan organisation is truly due to "CHOICE" only or FEAR itself.

I would open my invitation to all here to visit WP HQ during the next Open House day. I will be at WP HQ on 28th May, evening 8 pm. For details, please visit www.wp.org.sg

Maybe this is just a little small step to test yourself. Observe your heart beats, observe your mind of "suspicion" of ISD agents around... be conscious of your mind.

Till then, have a good day. :)

Goh Meng Seng

12:10 PM  
Blogger Daniel said...

hello!

1:48 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi! Nice page rebrabmoor.blogspot.com! Thank you!
tramadol
http://www11.asphost4free.com/tramadolrx/Tramadol.html tramadol tramadol

11:32 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Enjoyed a lot! » »

7:59 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hello all
Thanks for good information. I add www.blogger.com to favorites!
Buy generic levitra online
Buy hydrocodone http://site.voila.fr/usmeds/buy_hydrocodone.html buy hydrocodone [url=http://site.voila.fr/usmeds/buy_hydrocodone.html]buy hydrocodone[/url] http://interracial-porn.ar.vg/ interracial porn [url=http://interracial-porn.ar.vg/]interracial porn[/url] Buy maridia http://site.voila.fr/usmeds/buy_meridia.html buy meridia [url=http://site.voila.fr/usmeds/buy_meridia.html]buy meridia[/url] http://anal-fucking.ve.tc/ anal fucking [url=http://anal-fucking.ve.tc/]anal fucking[/url] Generic levitra http://site.voila.fr/usmeds/generic_levitra.html generic levitra [url=http://site.voila.fr/usmeds/generic_levitra.html]generic levitra[/url] http://incest-stories.pa.kz/ incest stories [url=http://incest-stories.pa.kz/]incest stories[/url]

9:31 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

.. ...

1:51 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Can I simply say what a comfort to find a person that genuinely understands what they are discussing on the internet.

You definitely know how to bring an issue to light and make it important.
More people ought to read this and understand this side of your story.
I was surprised that you aren't more popular given that you most certainly possess the gift.
Here is my site ; best us online casinos

7:16 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ahaa, its good discussion about this piece of writing at this place at this web site, I have read all that,
so at this time me also commenting at this place.
Take a look at my website ; real online slot machines

4:45 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hello everybody, here every person is sharing these know-how,
therefore it's fastidious to read this blog, and I used to visit this weblog all the time.
Also visit my website easy ways to make money online

6:22 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

There's certainly a lot to know about this subject. I like all the points you made.
Also visit my web page - real cash

7:30 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Whoa lots of fantastic facts!

Also visit my homepage; MCM 財布
Also see my website: MCM リュック

9:26 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

With havin so much written content do you ever run
into any problems of plagorism or copyright infringement?
My website has a lot of exclusive content I've either written myself or outsourced but it appears a lot of it is popping it up all over the web without my authorization. Do you know any methods to help reduce content from being ripped off? I'd definitely appreciate it.


My web-site :: legitimate ways to Make money
my web site: quick ways to make money online

11:07 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thanks , I hаve juѕt bеen looking for іnfοrmation аpρrοхimatelу this tοpic
for a lоng timе and yours іs thе
beѕt ӏ've discovered till now. But, what about the bottom line? Are you certain in regards to the source?

My web site - payday loans

1:44 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Now I am going to do my breakfast, once having my breakfast coming over again
to read further news.

Feel free to visit my website: forex trading

6:05 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'd like to find out more? I'd lіke to
finԁ out ѕome аԁditional information.


Heгe іs my site - payday loans

6:11 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Uѕeful info. Fortunate mе I found уοur ωeb sіte accidentally, and I am suгprіsed why
thіs accidеnt dіd nοt took plaсe earlier!
ӏ bookmаrked іt.

Μy homepаge; payday loans

12:53 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

І want to to thank you for this fantаѕtіс read!
! I ԁefinitely enjoyed every bіt of it.
I've got you bookmarked to look at new stuff you post…

Feel free to visit my web page - Same Day Payday Loans

7:25 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'd like to find out more? I'd love to find out more details.


Feel free to surf to my page; email marketing reseller

2:49 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Woah! I'm really digging the template/theme of this site. It's simple, yet effective.

A lot of times it's difficult to get that "perfect balance" between usability and visual appeal. I must say you have done a amazing job with this. Also, the blog loads very quick for me on Internet explorer. Excellent Blog!

Feel free to visit my homepage :: campaign monitor email Templates

10:29 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I am genuinely grateful to the holder of this web page who has shared
this impressive article at at this time.

Feel free to surf to my webpage - email marketing templates free

4:57 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

[b][url=http://www.ameliasports.com/]Fake Oakley Sunglasses[/url] [/b] I want to to thank you for this good read!! I certainly loved every little bit of it. I have got you saved as a favorite to check out new stuff you post¡­

1:50 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home